Kintela's Martin Ferguson paints an Oz-like picture of managed travel and challenges the industry to have the confidence to avoid its own mirage.
There is a particular kind of interest swirling
around the managed business travel sector. The investment community is watching
closely, trying to understand whether the industry is genuinely mid-transition
or simply better at talking about change than delivering it.
From the outside, the logic behind the
current direction of travel seems easy to understand. Travel, expense, payments
and data belong together. That is where the corporate authority, particularly
in the global multinational segment, sits. It is where governance and control
combine. In this world, scale matters in a way standalone tools struggle to
match, which helps explain why large platforms attract intense scrutiny, and
why alliances and acquisitions tend to be positioned as long-term structural
plays.
That logic mirrors how organisations
actually operate and how finance leaders think about risk, compliance and
spend. The destination itself is clear enough. What’s often glossed over is how
tough the journey is to actually get there.
The industry, for now, lives in an
uncomfortable halfway house. Supplier economics still shape behaviour, even as
the vocabulary shifts to “platforms” and “orchestration”. Many buyers still
treat travel as a commodity while asking for stronger duty of care, cleaner
data and a better traveller experience. Technology promises simplification but often
adds another layer that still has to be implemented, maintained and paid for.
The tension between ambition and delivery depends
on scale, but it is felt just as acutely by mid-market, SME buyers and regional
agencies who usually have to absorb complexity created by the bigger players.
That makes change slower and more vulnerable than most tech roadmaps care to
admit. Which helps explain why compelling stories are often told well before
the work is finished.
Building the Emerald City?
The Emerald City starts to take shape here.
A place where booking, expense, payments and data dance in formation like the
Munchkins. Compliance becomes more like a set of intelligent guardrails rather
than a tornado of reminders. Insights matter as much as the transactions
themselves. The yellow brick road is the narrative that leads there. It is persuasive
and easy to present but it skips a number of difficult miles.
Every transformation story eventually meets
its Wicked Witch. In our industry, the witch is spin and idealism. It’s
LinkedIn trolls and instant solutions. Launches designed to reassure investors
and unsettle competitors. The idealism works for a while, but then you can’t
escape reality. In reality, that means complex migration plans, operational
friction and buyers applying pressure by asking simple questions: does it work?
Can it be rolled out where I need it? Does it improve compliance without
breaking my programme? Will it make my travellers happier?
Defending the Lion
The more interesting character, however, is
the lion.
The lion carries strength that the story
rarely acknowledges. The managed travel sector sometimes looks coy about its
own role. It gets drawn in by language that sounds sleeker, more modern and
more valuable. Software. Platform. Fintech adjacent. AI led. These are labels
that help with valuation stories but divert attention away from the craft that
Tony Pilcher and his peers, the original travel managers, pioneered decades ago
and which is still practised today. What is often missing is the courage to
defend that craft openly.
Orchestration at scale. Managing a type of
complexity many organisations would, or do, prefer to ignore, while balancing
commercial tensions between buyers and suppliers. Keeping programmes working in
an uncertain world. Much of the work is unglamorous and even taken for granted.
Or more bluntly: not paid for. As more processes are standardised, judgement,
experience and pragmatic intervention become the premium.
The irony is that the lion already has much
of what Emerald City needs. Scale and reach. Deep operational knowledge.
Customer relationships. Courage, it seems, is the missing ingredient. When that
wavers, we see leaders pivot to language that weakens the sector’s connection
to its roots. And the industry starts doubting the value of what it already
delivers.
Confidence to Drive Sustainable Change
Comparisons with Waiting for Godot
become harder to ignore. The future always sits just a short distance ahead.
Another roadmap or integration. Another press release about what comes next.
Everyone prepares and waits, while at the same time the here and now keeps
building momentum. Buyers keep parsing through the noise. Teams keep absorbing
change and credibility ebbs away through small misses rather than dramatic
failures.
Integration, though, still deserves serious
commitment. It also demands honesty about the work. Integrated finance, expense
and travel arrive through products that work in unison, migrations that succeed
at enterprise scale, and, to borrow slightly from Caroline Strachan, a steady
rebuilding of trust. Organisations need time to adapt, and programmes need
stability while change is introduced.
The managed business travel sector should
benefit from clarity about its own relevance, a better understanding of what
actually creates customer value, and the confidence to work at the pace real
organisations can sustain. Emerald City is reached on foot. The road there is
as real as the effort required to get there. Are we prepared to go the distance
without losing ourselves on the way?